netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] openvswitch: Use zerocopy if applicable when performing the upcall

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1369492772.3301.468.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Date:	Sat, 25 May 2013 07:39:32 -0700
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>
Cc:	Jesse Gross <jesse@...ira.com>, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"dev@...nvswitch.org" <dev@...nvswitch.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] openvswitch: Use zerocopy if applicable
 when performing the upcall

On Sat, 2013-05-25 at 08:02 +0100, Thomas Graf wrote:

> I ran TCP_CRR to verify the SYN/ACK use case and I did not
> observe a difference. If you have any specific test in mind
> I will be glad to run that before posting the 2nd revision.

I guess you should test with rx checksum disabled as well, Jesse seemed
to be concerned about that.

ethtool -K eth0 rx off



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html