[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1369584645.3469.343.camel@deadeye.wl.decadent.org.uk>
Date: Sun, 26 May 2013 17:10:45 +0100
From: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To: Stéphane Glondu <glondu@...ian.org>
Cc: 709616@...s.debian.org, e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Bug#709616: floods the network with pause packets
On Sun, 2013-05-26 at 11:02 +0200, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
> Le 26/05/2013 03:54, Ben Hutchings a écrit :
> > I forgot, e1000e still doesn't report autoneg state completely through
> > ethtool. How about 'mii-tool -v eth0'?
>
> # mii-tool -v eth0
> SIOCGMIIREG on eth0 failed: Input/output error
> SIOCGMIIREG on eth0 failed: Input/output error
> eth0: negotiated 100baseTx-FD flow-control, link ok
> product info: vendor 00:55:00, model 9 rev 0
> basic mode: autonegotiation enabled
> basic status: autonegotiation complete, link ok
> capabilities: 1000baseT-FD 100baseTx-FD 100baseTx-HD 10baseT-FD 10baseT-HD
> advertising: 100baseTx-FD 100baseTx-HD 10baseT-FD 10baseT-HD flow-control
> link partner: 1000baseT-FD 100baseTx-FD 100baseTx-HD 10baseT-FD
> 10baseT-HD flow-control
OK, so the switch is indeed defective: it says it can handle pause
frames, but it can't.
Could you check whether the switch is also sending pause frames back to
the port that's generating them?
> I am not sure about who to put in CC of this mail; I've just put the
> Debian bug.
You replied-to-all, which is correct.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Computers are not intelligent. They only think they are.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (829 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists