netdev - Re: [PATCH] ptp_pch: depends on PCI

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1369665190.3469.344.camel@deadeye.wl.decadent.org.uk>
Date:	Mon, 27 May 2013 15:33:10 +0100
From:	Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:	<kyle@...hat.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	<richardcochran@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ptp_pch: depends on PCI

On Sat, 2013-05-25 at 23:11 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Kyle McMartin <kyle@...hat.com>
> Date: Sat, 25 May 2013 12:55:07 -0400
> 
> > It's only accessible via PCI, but has no dependencies, so it ends up
> > being selected on s390 where a bunch of primitives only exist if
> > CONFIG_PCI=y (such as {request,free}_irq)
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Kyle McMartin <kyle@...hat.com>
> 
> I've already told the s390 people they have to fix this properly.
> 
> They have to provide stubs for request_irq() et al. when CONFIG_PCI
> is not enabled.
> 
> This Kconfig change is therefore not appropriate.

You are quite right about request_irq(), but this is a PCI driver.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings, Staff Engineer, Solarflare
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html