[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ko4kcr$h8j$1@ger.gmane.org>
Date: Wed, 29 May 2013 10:13:48 +0000 (UTC)
From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH iproute2] vxlan: allow specifying multiple default
destinations
On Wed, 29 May 2013 at 10:00 GMT, Mike Rapoport <mike.rapoport@...ellosystems.com> wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <mike.rapoport@...ellosystems.com>
> ---
> ip/iplink_vxlan.c | 125 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 125 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/ip/iplink_vxlan.c b/ip/iplink_vxlan.c
> index 1025326..be6c0ac 100644
> --- a/ip/iplink_vxlan.c
> +++ b/ip/iplink_vxlan.c
> @@ -28,11 +28,87 @@ static void explain(void)
> fprintf(stderr, " [ port MIN MAX ] [ [no]learning ]\n");
> fprintf(stderr, " [ [no]proxy ] [ [no]rsc ]\n");
> fprintf(stderr, " [ [no]l2miss ] [ [no]l3miss ]\n");
> + fprintf(stderr, " [ dstadd DST ]\n");
> + fprintf(stderr, " [ dstdel ADDR ]\n");
Excuse me, but this looks like a design failure as you manipulate
remotes with `ip link` while creating vxlan devices, shouldn't this be
in a standard alone tool if we can't reuse any existing tool? Or am I
missing anything?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists