[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AE90C24D6B3A694183C094C60CF0A2F6026B7257@saturn3.aculab.com>
Date: Wed, 29 May 2013 14:42:11 +0100
From: "David Laight" <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
To: "Eric Dumazet" <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
"Eliezer Tamir" <eliezer.tamir@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: "David Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"Jesse Brandeburg" <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
"Don Skidmore" <donald.c.skidmore@...el.com>,
<e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
"Willem de Bruijn" <willemb@...gle.com>,
"Andi Kleen" <andi@...stfloor.org>, "HPA" <hpa@...or.com>,
"Eilon Greenstien" <eilong@...adcom.com>,
"Or Gerlitz" <or.gerlitz@...il.com>,
"Alex Rosenbaum" <alexr@...lanox.com>,
"Eliezer Tamir" <eliezer@...ir.org.il>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v6 net-next 2/5] net: implement support for low latency socket polling
> > +/* we don't mind a ~2.5% imprecision */
> > +#define TSC_MHZ (tsc_khz >> 10)
Wouldn't (tsc_khz << 10) be better?
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists