[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1369835337.5109.24.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Date: Wed, 29 May 2013 06:48:57 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
Cc: Eliezer Tamir <eliezer.tamir@...ux.intel.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
Don Skidmore <donald.c.skidmore@...el.com>,
e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, HPA <hpa@...or.com>,
Eilon Greenstien <eilong@...adcom.com>,
Or Gerlitz <or.gerlitz@...il.com>,
Alex Rosenbaum <alexr@...lanox.com>,
Eliezer Tamir <eliezer@...ir.org.il>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v6 net-next 2/5] net: implement support for low latency
socket polling
On Wed, 2013-05-29 at 14:42 +0100, David Laight wrote:
> > > +/* we don't mind a ~2.5% imprecision */
> > > +#define TSC_MHZ (tsc_khz >> 10)
>
> Wouldn't (tsc_khz << 10) be better?
We want number of cycles per usec.
Your formula gives number of cycles per 1.024 second.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists