netdev - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the net-next tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130529080320.GA2961@kroah.com>
Date:	Wed, 29 May 2013 17:03:21 +0900
From:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	"Tülin İzer" <tulinizer@...il.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the net-next
 tree

On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 02:14:22PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Greg,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the staging tree got a conflict in
> drivers/staging/silicom/bpctl_mod.c between commit 351638e7deee ("net:
> pass info struct via netdevice notifier") from the net-next tree and
> commit f84b075178b4 ("Staging: silicom: Fixed error 'do not initialise
> statics to 0 or NULL'") from the staging tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
> is required).

The fix looks great, thanks.

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html