[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1369951315-14742-1-git-send-email-alanr@unix.sh>
Date: Thu, 30 May 2013 16:01:55 -0600
From: Alan Robertson <alanr@...x.sh>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>,
Vlad Yasevich <vyasevic@...hat.com>
Cc: Alan Robertson <alanr@...x.sh>
Subject: [PATCH net] rtnetlink: ndo_dflt_fdb_del() never works
ndo_dflt_fdb_del is checking for a condition which is opposite that
which ndo_dflt_fdb_add enforces. ndo_dflt_fdb_add declares an error
if (ndm->ndm_state && !(ndm->ndm_state) & NUD_PERMANENT)) - that is, if the
entry is static. This is consistent with the failure error message.
On the other hand, ndo_dflt_del() declares an error
if (ndm_state & NUD_PERMANENT) - which is inconsistent with the add
precondition, and inconsistent with its failure message text.
As it is now, you can't delete any entry which add allows to be added -
so entry deletion always fails.
Signed-off-by: Alan Robertson <alanr@...x.sh>
---
net/core/rtnetlink.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/core/rtnetlink.c b/net/core/rtnetlink.c
index a08bd2b..373a8e7 100644
--- a/net/core/rtnetlink.c
+++ b/net/core/rtnetlink.c
@@ -2142,7 +2142,7 @@ int ndo_dflt_fdb_del(struct ndmsg *ndm,
/* If aging addresses are supported device will need to
* implement its own handler for this.
*/
- if (ndm->ndm_state & NUD_PERMANENT) {
+ if (!(ndm->ndm_state & NUD_PERMANENT)) {
pr_info("%s: FDB only supports static addresses\n", dev->name);
return -EINVAL;
}
--
1.8.1.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists