[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87k3mg60ww.fsf@codemonkey.ws>
Date: Thu, 30 May 2013 08:40:47 -0500
From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@...emonkey.ws>
To: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...il.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>, herbert@...dor.hengli.com.au,
kvm <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, qemu-devel <qemu-devel@...gnu.org>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Virtualization <virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Dmitry Fleytman <dmitry@...nix.com>
Subject: Re: updated: kvm networking todo wiki
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...il.com> writes:
> On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 7:23 AM, Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au> wrote:
>> Anthony Liguori <anthony@...emonkey.ws> writes:
>>> Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au> writes:
>>>> On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 08:47:58AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>>>> FWIW, I think what's more interesting is using vhost-net as a networking
>>>>> backend with virtio-net in QEMU being what's guest facing.
>>>>>
>>>>> In theory, this gives you the best of both worlds: QEMU acts as a first
>>>>> line of defense against a malicious guest while still getting the
>>>>> performance advantages of vhost-net (zero-copy).
>>>>>
>>>> It would be an interesting idea if we didn't already have the vhost
>>>> model where we don't need the userspace bounce.
>>>
>>> The model is very interesting for QEMU because then we can use vhost as
>>> a backend for other types of network adapters (like vmxnet3 or even
>>> e1000).
>>>
>>> It also helps for things like fault tolerance where we need to be able
>>> to control packet flow within QEMU.
>>
>> (CC's reduced, context added, Dmitry Fleytman added for vmxnet3 thoughts).
>>
>> Then I'm really confused as to what this would look like. A zero copy
>> sendmsg? We should be able to implement that today.
>>
>> On the receive side, what can we do better than readv? If we need to
>> return to userspace to tell the guest that we've got a new packet, we
>> don't win on latency. We might reduce syscall overhead with a
>> multi-dimensional readv to read multiple packets at once?
>
> Sounds like recvmmsg(2).
Could we map this to mergable rx buffers though?
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
>
> Stefan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists