[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <OFF0160A91.9C9E7EC3-ON85257B80.00594BB9-85257B80.005A8D71@us.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2013 12:29:05 -0400
From: David Stevens <dlstevens@...ibm.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <mike.rapoport@...ellosystems.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, netdev-owner@...r.kernel.org,
Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>
Subject: Re: [RFC] vxlan: convert remote list to list_rcu
Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org> wrote on 06/04/2013
12:00:31 PM:
> I am still not 100% convinced of the use case of providing multiple
> destinations.
> It seems like either a solution for migrating guests, a way to do
> SPAN, or a weird
> form of multicast.
The use is, as you would say it, a weird form of multicast. It
is to allow forwarding MAC multicasts without relying on the
underlying network having multicast routers in the same domain.
> Wouldn't it be better to use something like TC actions for these
> special cases and
> handle it at the IP layer rather than having to add so much
> complexity into the
> VXLAN driver itself.
This isn't a "special case" for DOVE -- it is the mechanism
for doing MAC multicasts. I don't agree that the code is
complex -- it simply replaces what was a vxlan_rdst with a
list of vxlan_rdsts. And, no, I don't believe it can be
done with equivalent performance using external mechanisms.
Didn't we have this discussion when the patch went in?
+-DLS
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists