netdev - Re: [PATCH] xen-netback: don't de-reference vif pointer after having called xenvif

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1370445211.24512.196.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com>
Date:	Wed, 5 Jun 2013 16:13:31 +0100
From:	Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@...rix.com>
To:	Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com>
CC:	<davem@...emloft.net>, xen-devel <xen-devel@...ts.xen.org>,
	<netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen-netback: don't de-reference vif pointer after
 having called xenvif_put()

On Wed, 2013-06-05 at 15:03 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> When putting vif-s on the rx notify list, calling xenvif_put() must be
> deferred until after the removal from the list and the issuing of the
> notification, as both operations dereference the pointer.
> 
> Changing this got me to notice that the "irq" variable was effectively
> unused (and was of too narrow type anyway).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...e.com>

Acked-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@...rix.com>


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html