[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1370458531.1918.3.camel@bwh-desktop.uk.level5networks.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2013 19:55:31 +0100
From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
CC: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net_sched: add 64bit rate estimators
On Tue, 2013-06-04 at 22:00 -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
>
> struct gnet_stats_rate_est contains u32 fields, so the byte per second
> field can wrap at 34360Mbit.
>
> Add a new gnet_stats_rate_est64 structure to get 64bit bps field, and
> switch the kernel to use this structure natively.
[...]
> /**
> + * struct gnet_stats_rate_est64 - rate estimator
> + * @bps: current byte rate
> + * @pps: current packet rate
> + */
> +struct gnet_stats_rate_est64 {
> + __u64 bps;
> + __u32 pps;
> +} __attribute__ ((packed));
[...]
Using attribute packed (which should be written as __packed) forces the
alignment of each member and the structure as a whole to be 1. For an
architecture where unaligned access is expensive, gcc will make all
reads and writes use byte operations.
I think you have to add a dummy __u32 member instead.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings, Staff Engineer, Solarflare
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists