[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <kouci0$2eu$1@ger.gmane.org>
Date: Sat, 8 Jun 2013 04:39:29 +0000 (UTC)
From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] igmp: hash a hash table to speedup
ip_check_mc_rcu()
On Fri, 07 Jun 2013 at 15:48 GMT, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:
> diff --git a/include/linux/igmp.h b/include/linux/igmp.h
> index 7f2bf15..e3362b5 100644
> --- a/include/linux/igmp.h
> +++ b/include/linux/igmp.h
> @@ -84,6 +84,7 @@ struct ip_mc_list {
> struct ip_mc_list *next;
> struct ip_mc_list __rcu *next_rcu;
> };
> + struct ip_mc_list __rcu *next_hash;
Why not put this into the above union?
> +static void ip_mc_hash_add(struct in_device *in_dev,
> + struct ip_mc_list *im)
> +{
> + struct ip_mc_list __rcu **mc_hash;
> + u32 hash;
> +
> + mc_hash = rtnl_dereference(in_dev->mc_hash);
> + if (mc_hash) {
> + hash = ip_mc_hash(im);
> + im->next_hash = rtnl_dereference(mc_hash[hash]);
> + rcu_assign_pointer(mc_hash[hash], im);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + /* do not use a hash table for small number of items */
> + if (in_dev->mc_count < 4)
> + return;
Can this check be moved to the beginning of this function?
> +
> + mc_hash = kzalloc(sizeof(struct ip_mc_list *) << MC_HASH_SZ_LOG,
> + GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!mc_hash)
> + return;
> +
> + for_each_pmc_rtnl(in_dev, im) {
> + hash = ip_mc_hash(im);
> + im->next_hash = rtnl_dereference(mc_hash[hash]);
> + RCU_INIT_POINTER(mc_hash[hash], im);
> + }
> +
> + rcu_assign_pointer(in_dev->mc_hash, mc_hash);
> +}
> +
Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists