[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1370833653.11543.3.camel@cr0>
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 11:07:33 +0800
From: Cong Wang <amwang@...hat.com>
To: David Stevens <dlstevens@...ibm.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
netdev-owner@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
Subject: Re: [Patch net-next v3 1/3] igmp: fix return value of some functions
On Sat, 2013-06-08 at 20:12 -0600, David Stevens wrote:
> >From: Cong Wang <amwang@...hat.com>
>
> > Good point! I will convert the such return value to
> >documented ones, for example, EINVAL. Thanks!
>
> You're also taking things that were not treated as errors
> before, and now returning an error. For example, removing
> a source not in the list.
>
> Unless POSIX requires these to be treated as errors, and
> that should be quoted, I think the 8 or 9 years of returning
> "0" for these cases means we must continue to. Existing
> programs that have always done this with a zero return
> will start getting errors where they didn't before.
>
> Also, though it's been a long time, I believe the original code
> did return errors in those cases (which is why the code is there)
> and was changed to return 0, presumably for POSIX compliance.
Are you suggesting to just make ip_mc_leave_src() void?
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists