netdev - Re: Fwd: [BUG] Bisected Gianfar not receiving any traffic

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 10 Jun 2013 11:29:06 +0300
From:	Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@...escale.com>
To:	Michael Guntsche <michael.guntsche@...loops.com>
CC:	<netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Fwd: [BUG] Bisected Gianfar not receiving any traffic

Hello,

Please provide the model of your board. Commit 6be5ed3fef568
relies on correct indication from H/W for Rx processing, so we
should check whether the right register/mask are being used for
that model or whether there's a missing errata.
One way to confirm this is by checking if Rx processing (and not Tx)
is entered with num_act_queues == 0 (the RXF indication set to 0).

Thanks,
Claudiu

On 6/9/2013 11:28 PM, Michael Guntsche wrote:
> Forwarded to the correct mailing list address.
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Michael Guntsche <michael.guntsche@...loops.com>
> Date: Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 10:26 PM
> Subject: [BUG] Bisected Gianfar not receiving any traffic
> To: linux-netdev@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@...escale.com>
>
>
> Good evening,
>
> While testing one of my powerpc based embedded ports I noticed that
> with any 3.10-rc kernel ethernet traffic was dead on my two gianfar
> NICs. The strange thing was that apparetnly outbound broadcasts seemed
> to work since avahi correctly registered the name of the board. I
> bisected it to the following commit.
>
> 6be5ed3fef568 gianfar: Poll only active Rx queues
>
> Reverting this commit on 3.10-rc4 made both gianfar devices work
> again. This is a rather old board so it could be that the register
> that's used here is just plain wrong in my case. A few years ago I had
> a similar issue where the implementation on the board here apparently
> did not work correctly.
>
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=131297524825104&w=2
>
> In that case a flag was bogus as well.
> If you need more information or want me to test a patch please add me
> as CC since I am not subscribed to the list.
>
> Kind regards,
> Michael Guntsche
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
>


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html