[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20130611.023400.1305427475808933449.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2013 02:34:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: amwang@...hat.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, edumazet@...gle.com,
alexander.h.duyck@...el.com
Subject: Re: [Patch net-next] net: add doc for ip_early_demux sysctl
From: Cong Wang <amwang@...hat.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2013 13:10:23 +0800
> + It may add an additional cost to routing that reduces overall
> + throughput, in such case you should disable it.
I would state this as "additional cost for pure routing workloads" to
emphasize the fact that the potential bad case is when we are not
delivering to a local socket.
The way you have it worded, it makes it sound like route lookups (in
general) will perform more poorly. This is simply not the case.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists