[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20130613.024715.260290333100191694.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 02:47:15 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: eric.dumazet@...il.com
Cc: ncardwell@...gle.com, ycheng@...gle.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
nanditad@...gle.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] tcp: properly send new data in fast recovery
in first RTT
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2013 20:57:55 -0700
> On Tue, 2013-06-11 at 19:56 -0400, Neal Cardwell wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 6:35 PM, Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@...gle.com> wrote:
>> > Linux sends new unset data during disorder and recovery state if all
>> > (suspected) lost packets have been retransmitted ( RFC5681, section
>> > 3.2 step 1 & 2, RFC3517 section 4, NexSeg() Rule 2). One requirement
>> > is to keep the receive window about twice the estimated sender's
>> > congestion window (tcp_rcv_space_adjust()), assuming the fast
>> > retransmits repair the losses in the next round trip.
>> >
>> > But currently it's not the case on the first round trip in either
>> > normal or Fast Open connection, beucase the initial receive window
>> > is identical to (expected) sender's initial congestion window. The
>> > fix is to double it.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@...gle.com>
>>
>> Acked-by: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>
>
> Yes, this is indeed a very nice catch, thanks Yuchung !
>
> Acked-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Applied, thanks everyone.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists