[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1371469024.3252.184.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 04:37:04 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Amir Vadai <amirv@...lanox.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
eliezer.tamir@...ux.intel.com, Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] net/mlx4_en: Add Low Latency Socket (LLS)
support
On Mon, 2013-06-17 at 13:58 +0300, Amir Vadai wrote:
> Add basic support for LLS.
>
> Signed-off-by: Amir Vadai <amirv@...lanox.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_cq.c | 2 +
> drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_netdev.c | 49 +++++++++-
> drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_rx.c | 8 ++
> drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/mlx4_en.h | 124 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 4 files changed, 181 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_cq.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_cq.c
> index 1e6c594..5e47efd 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_cq.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_cq.c
> @@ -139,6 +139,7 @@ int mlx4_en_activate_cq(struct mlx4_en_priv *priv, struct mlx4_en_cq *cq,
>
> if (!cq->is_tx) {
> netif_napi_add(cq->dev, &cq->napi, mlx4_en_poll_rx_cq, 64);
> + napi_hash_add(&cq->napi);
> napi_enable(&cq->napi);
> }
>
> @@ -162,6 +163,7 @@ void mlx4_en_deactivate_cq(struct mlx4_en_priv *priv, struct mlx4_en_cq *cq)
> {
> if (!cq->is_tx) {
> napi_disable(&cq->napi);
> + napi_hash_del(&cq->napi);
Are we sure an RCU grace period is respected before deletion of memory
holding cq->napi ?
> netif_napi_del(&cq->napi);
> }
>
...
>
> static const struct net_device_ops mlx4_netdev_ops_master = {
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_rx.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_rx.c
> index 02aee1e..15b5980 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_rx.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_rx.c
> @@ -31,6 +31,7 @@
> *
> */
>
> +#include <net/ll_poll.h>
> #include <linux/mlx4/cq.h>
> #include <linux/slab.h>
> #include <linux/mlx4/qp.h>
> @@ -737,6 +738,8 @@ int mlx4_en_process_rx_cq(struct net_device *dev, struct mlx4_en_cq *cq, int bud
> timestamp);
> }
>
> + skb_mark_ll(skb, &cq->napi);
> +
It seems there is a second point in the driver calling napi_gro_frags(),
around line 696
It looks like LLS wont be supported for this case ?
> /* Push it up the stack */
> netif_receive_skb(skb);
>
> @@ -781,8 +784,13 @@ int mlx4_en_poll_rx_cq(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
> struct mlx4_en_priv *priv = netdev_priv(dev);
> int done;
>
> + if (!mlx4_en_cq_lock_napi(cq))
> + return budget;
> +
> done = mlx4_en_process_rx_cq(dev, cq, budget);
>
> + mlx4_en_cq_unlock_napi(cq);
> +
> /* If we used up all the quota - we're probably not done yet... */
> if (done == budget)
> INC_PERF_COUNTER(priv->pstats.napi_quota);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists