[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130617140145.GH2718@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 15:01:45 +0100
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>
Cc: Alex Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>,
Bruce Allan <bruce.w.allan@...el.com>,
Carolyn Wyborny <carolyn.wyborny@...el.com>,
Don Skidmore <donald.c.skidmore@...el.com>,
e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
Greg Rose <gregory.v.rose@...el.com>,
Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
John Ronciak <john.ronciak@...el.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Peter P Waskiewicz Jr <peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@...el.com>,
Rasesh Mody <rmody@...cade.com>,
Tushar Dave <tushar.n.dave@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/7] Fixing dma mask setting in various network drivers
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 11:12:30AM -0700, Jesse Brandeburg wrote:
> This is my proposed change to the intel drivers. Comments?
>
> + if (!dma_set_mask(&pdev->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(64))) {
> + pci_using_dac = true;
> + /* coherent mask for the same size will always succeed if
> + * dma_set_mask does
> + */
> + dma_set_coherent_mask(&pdev->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(64));
> + } else if (!dma_set_mask(&pdev->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32))) {
> + pci_using_dac = false;
> + dma_set_coherent_mask(&pdev->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32));
> + } else {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "%s: DMA configuration failed: %d\n",
> + __func__, err);
> + err = -EIO;
> + goto err_dma;
> }
>
So, will you be going with this change rather than mine, which apparantly
Jeff queued? Please let me know what you decide so I can keep my private
git tree in sync with what you've decided to avoid conflicting with
further dma-mask changes which I'm working on.
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists