[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1371635505.3252.285.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 02:51:45 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: sock: adapt SOCK_MIN_RCVBUF and
SOCK_MIN_SNDBUF
On Wed, 2013-06-19 at 11:18 +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> The current situation is that SOCK_MIN_RCVBUF is 2048 + sizeof(struct sk_buff))
> while SOCK_MIN_SNDBUF is 2048. Since in both cases, skb->truesize is used for
> sk_{r,w}mem_alloc accounting, we should have both sizes equal and adjusted
> through the macro SKB_TRUESIZE(), which is also used elsewhere to adjust sk
> buffer sizes. The minor adaption in sk_stream_moderate_sndbuf() is to silence
> a warning by using a typed max macro, as similarly done in SOCK_MIN_RCVBUF
> occurences, that would appear otherwise.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>
> ---
> include/net/sock.h | 11 ++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/net/sock.h b/include/net/sock.h
> index ac8e181..189ef98 100644
> --- a/include/net/sock.h
> +++ b/include/net/sock.h
> @@ -2045,18 +2045,19 @@ static inline void sk_wake_async(struct sock *sk, int how, int band)
> sock_wake_async(sk->sk_socket, how, band);
> }
>
> -#define SOCK_MIN_SNDBUF 2048
> /*
> - * Since sk_rmem_alloc sums skb->truesize, even a small frame might need
> - * sizeof(sk_buff) + MTU + padding, unless net driver perform copybreak
> + * Since sk_{r,w}mem_alloc sums skb->truesize, even a small frame might
> + * need sizeof(sk_buff) + sizeof(skb_shared_info) + MTU + padding, unless
> + * net driver perform copybreak.
> */
> -#define SOCK_MIN_RCVBUF (2048 + sizeof(struct sk_buff))
> +#define SOCK_MIN_RCVBUF SKB_TRUESIZE(2048)
> +#define SOCK_MIN_SNDBUF SKB_TRUESIZE(2048)
>
>
> static inline void sk_stream_moderate_sndbuf(struct sock *sk)
> {
> if (!(sk->sk_userlocks & SOCK_SNDBUF_LOCK)) {
> sk->sk_sndbuf = min(sk->sk_sndbuf, sk->sk_wmem_queued >> 1);
> - sk->sk_sndbuf = max(sk->sk_sndbuf, SOCK_MIN_SNDBUF);
> + sk->sk_sndbuf = max_t(u32, sk->sk_sndbuf, SOCK_MIN_SNDBUF);
> }
> }
>
Funny you send this patch, because I prepared a similar patch
yesterday ;)
My motivation was a bit different, because we hit a (small) regression
here in Google for some applications setting low SO_SNDBUF/SO_RCVBUF
values, because of new TCP needs :
Minimal skb truesize in transmit path is indeed SKB_TRUESIZE(2048) after
commit f07d960df33c5aef ("tcp: avoid frag allocation for small frames")
And tcp sendmsg() tries to limit skb size to half the congestion window,
meaning we try to build two skbs at minimum.
So I believe that we need :
/* TCP works better if we can build two skbs at minimum */
#define SOCK_MIN_SNDBUF (2 * SKB_TRUESIZE(2048))
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists