lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPshTCgdb9FzKHzxkpDpowZjzqBv5yM_rBpcT88YmYBSojN8Tw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 18 Jun 2013 19:31:48 -0700
From:	Jerry Chu <hkchu@...gle.com>
To:	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
Subject: qlen check in tun.c

In tun_net_xmit() the max qlen is computed as
dev->tx_queue_len / tun->numqueues. For multi-queue configuration the
latter may be way too small, forcing one to adjust txqueuelen based
on number of queues created. (Well the default txqueuelen of
500/TUN_READQ_SIZE already seems too small even for single queue.)

Wouldn't it be better to simply use dev->tx_queue_len to cap the qlen of
each queue? This also seems to be more consistent with h/w multi-queues.

Also is there any objection to increase MAX_TAP_QUEUES from 8 to 16?
Yes it will take up more space in struct tun_struct. But we are
hitting the perf limit of 8 queues.

Thanks,

Jerry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ