netdev - Re: [PATCH v6] ethernet/arc/arc_emac

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHp75Vf8+z0B6PMjGqVNPuEJrVYiR-yMT5dvqqBAs=GA5utLrQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 20 Jun 2013 19:00:36 +0300
From:	Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To:	Alexey Brodkin <Alexey.Brodkin@...opsys.com>
Cc:	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com>,
	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
	Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@...opsys.com>,
	Mischa Jonker <Mischa.Jonker@...opsys.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
	Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
	Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Devicetree Discuss <devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
	Florian Fainelli <florian@...nwrt.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] ethernet/arc/arc_emac - Add new driver

On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 2:53 PM, Alexey Brodkin
<Alexey.Brodkin@...opsys.com> wrote:
> Driver for non-standard on-chip ethernet device ARC EMAC 10/100,
> instantiated in some legacy ARC (Synopsys) FPGA Boards such as
> ARCAngel4/ML50x.

Few nitpicks below.

> please take a look at 6th re-spin of the patch.

Usually it's better to start new thread for new version of the patchset.

> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/arc/emac_main.c

> +static void arc_emac_tx_clean(struct net_device *ndev)
> +{
> +       struct arc_emac_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
> +       struct net_device_stats *stats = &priv->stats;
> +       unsigned int i;
> +
> +       for (i = 0; i < TX_BD_NUM; i++) {
> +               unsigned int *txbd_dirty = &priv->txbd_dirty;
> +               struct arc_emac_bd *txbd = &priv->txbd[*txbd_dirty];
> +               struct buffer_state *tx_buff = &priv->tx_buff[*txbd_dirty];
> +               struct sk_buff *skb = tx_buff->skb;
> +               unsigned int info = le32_to_cpu(txbd->info);
> +
> +               *txbd_dirty = (*txbd_dirty + 1) % TX_BD_NUM;
> +
> +               if ((info & FOR_EMAC) || !txbd->data)

Redundant internal braces. Up to you.

> +static int arc_emac_rx(struct net_device *ndev, int budget)
> +{
> +       struct arc_emac_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
> +       unsigned int work_done;
> +
> +       for (work_done = 0; work_done <= budget; work_done++) {

> +               /* Make a note that we saw a packet at this BD.
> +                * So next time, driver starts from this + 1
> +                */
> +               *last_rx_bd = (*last_rx_bd + 1) % RX_BD_NUM;
> +
> +#define FRST_OR_LAST_MASK      (FRST_MASK | LAST_MASK)

You may re-use it in *_tx_clean() above.
Also, please use full English word FIRST. Actually is there any
conflicts with existing drivers? Should it be with [ARC_]EMAC prefix?

> +               /* Make sure pointer to data buffer is set */
> +               mb();

I'm not so familiar with memory barriers, but is this somehow differ
from smp_mb()?
Which one suits better? And what about the other places in this file?

> +       /* Allocate Tx BD's similar to Rx BD's. All Tx BD's owned by CPU */
> +       bd = priv->txbd;
> +       for (i = 0; i < TX_BD_NUM; i++) {
> +               bd->data = 0;
> +               bd->info = 0;
> +               bd++;
> +       }

Looks like
memset(priv->txbd, 0, siezeof(*priv->txbd) * TX_BD_NUM);

> +       *info = cpu_to_le32(FOR_EMAC | FRST_MASK | LAST_MASK | len);

FOR_EMAC | FRST_OR_LAST_MASK | len ?

> +       /* Increment index to point to the next BD */
> +       *txbd_curr = (*txbd_curr + 1) % TX_BD_NUM;

+ Empty line?

> +       /* Get "info" of the next BD */

> +       /* Get PHY from device tree */
> +       phy_node = of_parse_phandle(pdev->dev.of_node, "phy", 0);

> +       /* Get EMAC registers base address from device tree */
> +       err = of_address_to_resource(pdev->dev.of_node, 0, &res_regs);

> +       /* Get CPU clock frequency from device tree */
> +       if (of_property_read_u32(pdev->dev.of_node, "clock-frequency",
> +                                &clock_frequency)) {

> +       /* Get IRQ from device tree */
> +       err = of_irq_to_resource(pdev->dev.of_node, 0, &res_irq);

So, you don't like the idea to get as much as possible before
alloc_netdev(), don't you?

--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html