netdev - RE: [net-next 3/8] i40e: driver ethtool core

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <FC41C24E35F18A40888AACA1A36F3E4168533F3F@FMSMSX102.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date:	Thu, 20 Jun 2013 20:04:15 +0000
From:	"Nelson, Shannon" <shannon.nelson@...el.com>
To:	Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
CC:	"Kirsher, Jeffrey T" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
	"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	"Brandeburg, Jesse" <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"gospo@...hat.com" <gospo@...hat.com>,
	"sassmann@...hat.com" <sassmann@...hat.com>,
	"Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P" <peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@...el.com>,
	"e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net" 
	<e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>
Subject: RE: [net-next 3/8] i40e: driver ethtool core

> From: Ben Hutchings [mailto:bhutchings@...arflare.com]
> Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2013 12:59 PM
> 
> On Thu, 2013-06-20 at 19:47 +0000, Nelson, Shannon wrote:
> > > From: Ben Hutchings [mailto:bhutchings@...arflare.com]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2013 11:27 AM
> > >
> > > On Thu, 2013-06-13 at 20:55 -0700, Jeff Kirsher wrote:
> > > > From: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>
> [...]
> > > > +static struct i40e_stats i40e_gstrings_stats[] = {
> > > > +	I40E_PF_STAT("rx_bytes", stats.eth.rx_bytes),
> > > > +	I40E_PF_STAT("tx_bytes", stats.eth.tx_bytes),
> > > > +	I40E_PF_STAT("rx_errors", stats.eth.rx_errors),
> > > > +	I40E_PF_STAT("tx_errors", stats.eth.tx_errors),
> > >
> > > Duplicates.
> >
> > Well, not really are they duplicates - the NETDEV_STAT numbers are
> > specifically for each netdev that is attached to this device.  Because
> > the XL710 supports VMDq, SR-IOV, and some other device multiplexing
> > schemes, each netdev's NETDEV_STAT struct is the subset of the traffic
> > going through its portion of the device.
> >
> > The PF_STAT struct holds the stats for what actually goes through the
> > physical port.  This is not necessarily a summation of the various
> > NETDEV_STAT structs, because some connections may be talking to each
> > other and not out the physical port.
> >
> > When ethtool -S is called on the PF's netdev, we see both the netdev
> > and the ports stats printed.  When called on non-PF connection we only
> > see the netdev stats, none of the port stats.
> 
> Good point.  And this is something I've been meaning to bring up for
> discussion on netdev myself - we should have some naming convention to
> distinguish per-port and per-function/per-netdev statistics.

If you've got some ideas on a convention to use, we'd be happy to set the precedent.

sln