netdev - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20130619.203712.1274791928658538966.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Wed, 19 Jun 2013 20:37:12 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	sfr@...b.auug.org.au
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, johannes.berg@...el.com
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree

From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 12:58:23 +1000

> Today's linux-next merge of the net-next tree got a conflict in
> net/wireless/nl80211.c between commit 3a5a423bb958 ("nl80211: fix attrbuf
> access race by allocating a separate one") from the net tree and commit
> 5fe231e87372 ("cfg80211: vastly simplify locking") from the net-next tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
> is required).

I did this merge a few hours ago and hit the same conflict.

Although I fixed the bug in that rtnl_unlock() is not performed in
all the return code paths.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html