netdev - linux-next: just chaeking correctness of the infiniband tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20130621100928.36a0ccf45e310f02a4dff53a@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:	Fri, 21 Jun 2013 10:09:28 +1000
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Roland Dreier <roland@...nel.org>, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: linux-next: just chaeking correctness of the infiniband tree

Hi all,

I noticed that the infiniband tree is now based on the net-next tree.  I
assume that is deliberate?  I do have to question how much testing that
tree has had since it is now based on a tree that Dave only released in
the last 24 hours ...

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped