netdev - [PATCH 14/45] sched/rt: Use get/put_online_cpus

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130623134103.19094.5606.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com>
Date:	Sun, 23 Jun 2013 19:11:07 +0530
From:	"Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org, tj@...nel.org,
	oleg@...hat.com, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, rusty@...tcorp.com.au,
	mingo@...nel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, namhyung@...nel.org,
	walken@...gle.com, vincent.guittot@...aro.org, laijs@...fujitsu.com
Cc:	rostedt@...dmis.org, wangyun@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
	xiaoguangrong@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, sbw@....edu, fweisbec@...il.com,
	zhong@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, nikunj@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
	srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: [PATCH 14/45] sched/rt: Use get/put_online_cpus_atomic() to prevent
 CPU offline

Once stop_machine() is gone from the CPU offline path, we won't be able
to depend on disabling preemption to prevent CPUs from going offline
from under us.

Use the get/put_online_cpus_atomic() APIs to prevent CPUs from going
offline, while invoking from atomic context.

Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---

 kernel/sched/rt.c |   14 ++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/rt.c b/kernel/sched/rt.c
index 01970c8..03d9f38 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/rt.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/rt.c
@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
 #include "sched.h"
 
 #include <linux/slab.h>
+#include <linux/cpu.h>
 
 int sched_rr_timeslice = RR_TIMESLICE;
 
@@ -28,7 +29,9 @@ static enum hrtimer_restart sched_rt_period_timer(struct hrtimer *timer)
 		if (!overrun)
 			break;
 
+		get_online_cpus_atomic();
 		idle = do_sched_rt_period_timer(rt_b, overrun);
+		put_online_cpus_atomic();
 	}
 
 	return idle ? HRTIMER_NORESTART : HRTIMER_RESTART;
@@ -547,6 +550,7 @@ static int do_balance_runtime(struct rt_rq *rt_rq)
 	int i, weight, more = 0;
 	u64 rt_period;
 
+	get_online_cpus_atomic();
 	weight = cpumask_weight(rd->span);
 
 	raw_spin_lock(&rt_b->rt_runtime_lock);
@@ -588,6 +592,7 @@ next:
 		raw_spin_unlock(&iter->rt_runtime_lock);
 	}
 	raw_spin_unlock(&rt_b->rt_runtime_lock);
+	put_online_cpus_atomic();
 
 	return more;
 }
@@ -1168,6 +1173,10 @@ static void yield_task_rt(struct rq *rq)
 #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
 static int find_lowest_rq(struct task_struct *task);
 
+/*
+ * Must be called within get/put_online_cpus_atomic(), to prevent CPUs
+ * from going offline from under us.
+ */
 static int
 select_task_rq_rt(struct task_struct *p, int sd_flag, int flags)
 {
@@ -1561,6 +1570,8 @@ retry:
 		return 0;
 	}
 
+	get_online_cpus_atomic();
+
 	/* We might release rq lock */
 	get_task_struct(next_task);
 
@@ -1611,6 +1622,7 @@ retry:
 out:
 	put_task_struct(next_task);
 
+	put_online_cpus_atomic();
 	return ret;
 }
 
@@ -1630,6 +1642,7 @@ static int pull_rt_task(struct rq *this_rq)
 	if (likely(!rt_overloaded(this_rq)))
 		return 0;
 
+	get_online_cpus_atomic();
 	for_each_cpu(cpu, this_rq->rd->rto_mask) {
 		if (this_cpu == cpu)
 			continue;
@@ -1695,6 +1708,7 @@ skip:
 		double_unlock_balance(this_rq, src_rq);
 	}
 
+	put_online_cpus_atomic();
 	return ret;
 }
 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html