[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87txko9cn8.fsf@lebrac.rtp-net.org>
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2013 09:43:55 +0200
From: Arnaud Patard (Rtp) <arnaud.patard@...-net.org>
To: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Lior Amsalem <alior@...vell.com>,
Gregory Clément
<gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>,
Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@...e-electrons.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 2/2] Try to fix mvneta when compiled as module
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com> writes:
> Dear Arnaud Patard (Rtp),
>
> On Fri, 21 Jun 2013 00:06:46 +0200, Arnaud Patard (Rtp) wrote:
>
>> This patch sets the "sgmii serdes configuration" register to a magical value
>> found in:
>> https://github.com/yellowback/ubuntu-precise-armadaxp/blob/master/arch/arm/mach-armadaxp/armada_xp_family/ctrlEnv/mvCtrlEnvLib.c
>
> According to the Armada XP functional datasheet, this magical value
> 0xCC7 is the one to be used to configure a SERDES interface to use the
> "Protocol Generation Setting" SGMII. There are other magical values for
> DRSGMII, SQGMII, SATA Gen I and SATA Gen II. So you could really do:
>
> #define MVNETA_SGMII_SERDES_PROTO 0xcc7
>
ok.
>> With this change, the interrupts are working/generated and ethernet is
>> working.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Arnaud Patard <arnaud.patard@...-net.org>
>>
>> Index: linux-next/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c
>> ===================================================================
>> --- linux-next.orig/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c 2013-06-20 23:39:37.485391949 +0200
>> +++ linux-next/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c 2013-06-20 23:39:37.481391949 +0200
>> @@ -88,6 +88,8 @@
>> #define MVNETA_TX_IN_PRGRS BIT(1)
>> #define MVNETA_TX_FIFO_EMPTY BIT(8)
>> #define MVNETA_RX_MIN_FRAME_SIZE 0x247c
>> +#define MVETH_SGMII_SERDES_CFG 0x24A0
>> +#define MVETH_SGMII_SERDES_STAT 0x24A4
>
> You are not using this last define in your patch. Please also use
> MVNETA_ prefix for those defines, like all the other ones.
>
> However, there is one thing that I am not understanding completely. The
> C code you pointed above seems to do the following:
>
> pRegAddr[3] = SGMII_SERDES_CFG_REG(sgmiiPort);
> pRegAddr[4] = SGMII_SERDES_STAT_REG(sgmiiPort);
> [..]
> pRegVal[3] = (pSerdesInfo->busSpeed & (1 << serdesLineNum)) != 0 ? 0x1547 : 0xCC7;
> pRegVal[4] = 0x7;
>
> So:
>
> 1) In some conditions, it will use the 0x1547 value in some cases, and
> 0xCC7 in the other ones. And interestingly, the datasheet doesn't
> mention what the 0x1547 magical value is.
The problem I got was that I didn't understand how to 'translate' the
(1 << serdesLineNum) part, so I removed it. Moreover, dumping the
registers when everything built-in (aka 'working'), I read a value
corresponding to the 0xcc7 case but not the other one so it seemed to me
it was safer to not use the 0x1547 case.
>
> 2) It writes 0x7 to the SGMII_SERDES_STAT_REG register, but the
> datasheet mentions this register as a read-only register.
weird. Can be remains of code for old tape outs or something wrong on
the doc, 'fixed' in some pdf about erratas.
Thanks,
Arnaud
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists