[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJZOPZ+zMjkrTBh76PdxDB-xsLjNFdiC6ZbEgTjeFF2fzpSyeQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2013 17:09:21 +0300
From: Or Gerlitz <or.gerlitz@...il.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] mlx4: allow order-0 memory allocations in RX path
On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 6:17 PM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
>
> mlx4 exclusively uses order-2 allocations in RX path, which are
> likely to fail under memory pressure.
>
> We therefore drop frames more than needed.
>
> This patch tries order-3, order-2, order-1 and finally order-0
> allocations to keep good performance, yet allow allocations if/when
> memory gets fragmented.
>
> By using larger pages, and avoiding unnecessary get_page()/put_page()
> on compound pages, this patch improves performance as well, lowering
> false sharing on struct page.
>
> Also use GFP_KERNEL allocations in initialization path, as allocating 12
> MB (390 order-3 pages) can easily fail with GFP_ATOMIC.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
> Cc: Amir Vadai <amirv@...lanox.com>
Eric, this looks brilliant, I am OOO today, so will give it a try on
my systems tomorrow and ack, thanks for the good work!
Or.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists