[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51CA1A1B.5080700@xdin.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 00:30:51 +0200
From: Arvid Brodin <arvid.brodin@...n.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
Javier Boticario <jboticario@...il.com>,
"balferreira@...glemail.com" <balferreira@...glemail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/hsr: Add support for the High-availability Seamless
Redundancy protocol (HSRv0)
On 2013-06-25 02:07, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Jun 2013 09:44:01 -0700
> Arvid Brodin <arvid.brodin@...n.com> wrote:
>
>> +
>> +
>> +static bool is_admin_up(struct net_device *dev)
>> +{
>> + return dev && (dev->flags & IFF_UP);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static bool is_operstate_up(struct net_device *dev)
>> +{
>> + return (dev && (dev->operstate == IF_OPER_UP));
>> +}
>> +
>
> Isn't is_admin_up the same as netif_running()?
I don't think so (but I'm unsure). This is netif_running() (from include/linux/netdevice.h):
static inline bool netif_running(const struct net_device *dev)
{
return test_bit(__LINK_STATE_START, &dev->state);
}
I'm not sure what this does. I don't think it's the same as checking whether the admin has
issued an UP command?
> And is_operstate_up the same as netif_oper_up()?
netif_oper_up() also returns true if the device state is IF_OPER_UNKNOWN. A device can
have that state without even having carrier, so that's not OK for the HSR driver.
--
Arvid Brodin | Consultant (Linux)
T: +46-8-56254286 | M: +46-70-9714286 | arvid.brodin@...n.com
XDIN AB | Knarrarnäsgatan 7 | SE-164 40 Kista | Sweden | xdin.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists