[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20130625.165612.1653110297729408070.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 16:56:12 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, ebiederm@...ssion.com, bcrl@...ck.org,
ravi.mlists@...il.com, bhutchings@...arflare.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 2/2] sit: add support of x-netns
From: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 16:24:55 +0200
> @@ -453,6 +454,8 @@ int ip_tunnel_rcv(struct ip_tunnel *tunnel, struct sk_buff *skb,
> tstats->rx_bytes += skb->len;
> u64_stats_update_end(&tstats->syncp);
>
> + skb_scrub_packet(skb);
> +
> if (tunnel->dev->type == ARPHRD_ETHER) {
> skb->protocol = eth_type_trans(skb, tunnel->dev);
> skb_postpull_rcsum(skb, eth_hdr(skb), ETH_HLEN);
I can't see how this can be ok.
If something in netfilter depends upon the state you are clearing out
here, someone's packet filtering setup is going to break.
I'm not applying these patches, sorry.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists