netdev - Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 2/2] sit: add support of x-netns

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <51CADB72.3090206@6wind.com>
Date:	Wed, 26 Jun 2013 14:15:46 +0200
From:	Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>
To:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
CC:	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	bcrl@...ck.org, ravi.mlists@...il.com, bhutchings@...arflare.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 2/2] sit: add support of x-netns

Le 26/06/2013 12:22, Eric Dumazet a écrit :
> On Wed, 2013-06-26 at 03:03 -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>
>
>> That said I won't object if Nocolas Ditchel resends his patches with
>> that test put back in.  I just think it is silly and when someone
>> finally gets bit by the bug and complains we will have to go through and
>> remove the test.
>
> Well, what is the reason skb_orphan() must be called in a tunnel xmit
> path ?
>
> This patch changes more things than what advertised in changelog :(
In fact, this is true. If we finally found that skb_scrub_packet() is needed in 
all cases (not only when changing namespace), this will be another patch.

I will resend the serie with the test put back.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html