netdev - Re: [RFC Patch net-next 1/5] net: introduce generic union inet

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 27 Jun 2013 10:42:49 +0300
From:	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Cong Wang <amwang@...hat.com>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC Patch net-next 1/5] net: introduce generic union inet_addr

On Thu, 2013-06-27 at 14:43 +0800, Cong Wang wrote: 
> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <amwang@...hat.com>

I was about to answer for the Daniel's patch about %pig.

Daniel, could you resend your patch series to the LKML, since it touches
lib/vsprintf.c.
Also, regarding to your patch 2/2, could it be possible to split it to
two parts: first substitutes SCTP macros not related to IP addresses and
second one is explicitly targeting against SCTP_DEBUG_PRINTK_IPADDR ?
By the way, in some places in 2/2 you didn't change open coded function
name to the '"%s: ...", __func__, ...'.

Cong, I don't think is a good idea to update lib/ code and net/ code in
one patch, since that are logically a bit different. lib/ code sounds
more common, it's better if it leads separately this series.

-- 
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html