| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <1372318969.24799.70.camel@smile> Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 10:42:49 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> To: Cong Wang <amwang@...hat.com> Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC Patch net-next 1/5] net: introduce generic union inet_addr On Thu, 2013-06-27 at 14:43 +0800, Cong Wang wrote: > Cc: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com> > Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <amwang@...hat.com> I was about to answer for the Daniel's patch about %pig. Daniel, could you resend your patch series to the LKML, since it touches lib/vsprintf.c. Also, regarding to your patch 2/2, could it be possible to split it to two parts: first substitutes SCTP macros not related to IP addresses and second one is explicitly targeting against SCTP_DEBUG_PRINTK_IPADDR ? By the way, in some places in 2/2 you didn't change open coded function name to the '"%s: ...", __func__, ...'. Cong, I don't think is a good idea to update lib/ code and net/ code in one patch, since that are logically a bit different. lib/ code sounds more common, it's better if it leads separately this series. -- Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> Intel Finland Oy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists