[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51CC56D8.4020805@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 17:14:32 +0200
From: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
CC: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 2/2] net: sctp: rework debugging framework
to use pr_debug and friends
On 06/27/2013 04:49 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-06-27 at 11:43 +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
>> - Changed %pIg into %pIS, thanks Joe Perches
>
> Hi Daniel.
>
>> diff --git a/net/sctp/associola.c b/net/sctp/associola.c
> []
>> + pr_debug("%s: association:%p addr:%pIS port:%d\n",
>> + __func__, asoc, &peer->ipaddr.sa,
>> + ntohs(peer->ipaddr.v4.sin_port));
>
> This is why I think %pIS should have an option
> to print port/flow, etc.
Ok, agreed, that will be more clean and can be applied there.
I'll work that in, and when finished send a 3rd version of the set.
Thanks Joe!
> In this case it's using v4 and you are mixing
> unknown and known forms. It looks untidy.
> You should probably use peer->sa.sin_port instead.
>
>> @@ -636,12 +638,8 @@ struct sctp_transport *sctp_assoc_add_peer(struct sctp_association *asoc,
>> /* AF_INET and AF_INET6 share common port field. */
>> port = ntohs(addr->v4.sin_port);
>>
>> - SCTP_DEBUG_PRINTK_IPADDR("sctp_assoc_add_peer:association %p addr: ",
>> - " port: %d state:%d\n",
>> - asoc,
>> - addr,
>> - port,
>> - peer_state);
>> + pr_debug("%s: association:%p addr:%pIS port:%d state:%d\n", __func__,
>> + asoc, &addr->sa,port , peer_state);
>
> here too, but port may be unused when !CONFIG_DEBUG
>
> I didn't look at the rest of the patch.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists