netdev - Re: [PATCH] net: Check the argument for listen(2)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 28 Jun 2013 18:34:58 +0200
From:	Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
To:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
	Changli Gao <xiaosuo@...il.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: Check the argument for listen(2)

On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 06:32:34PM +0200, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 09:29:02AM -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > On Sat, 2013-06-29 at 00:14 +0800, Changli Gao wrote:
> > > --- a/net/ipv4/af_inet.c
> > > +++ b/net/ipv4/af_inet.c
> > > @@ -198,6 +198,9 @@ int inet_listen(struct socket *sock, int backlog)
> > >  	unsigned char old_state;
> > >  	int err;
> > >  
> > > +	if (backlog >= (1 << 16))
> > > +		return EINVAL;
> > > +
> > >  	lock_sock(sk);
> > >  
> > >  	err = -EINVAL;
> > 
> > This seems pretty buggy to me.
> > 
> > 1) EINVAL is not -EINVAL
> > 
> > 2) This might break existing applications.
> 
> Yes, we should clamp the value to netdev_max_backlog.

Nonsense, somaxconn would make more sense.

Sorry,

  Hannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html