[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51CD746F.7020603@oracle.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 19:33:03 +0800
From: Joe Jin <joe.jin@...cle.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
CC: Frank Blaschka <frank.blaschka@...ibm.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"zheng.x.li@...cle.com" <zheng.x.li@...cle.com>,
Xen Devel <xen-devel@...ts.xen.org>,
Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@...rix.com>,
Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com>,
Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>
Subject: Re: kernel panic in skb_copy_bits
Hi Eric,
Thanks for your patch, I'll test it then get back to you.
Regards,
Joe
On 06/28/13 17:37, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> OK please try the following patch
>
>
> [PATCH] neighbour: fix a race in neigh_destroy()
>
> There is a race in neighbour code, because neigh_destroy() uses
> skb_queue_purge(&neigh->arp_queue) without holding neighbour lock,
> while other parts of the code assume neighbour rwlock is what
> protects arp_queue
>
> Convert all skb_queue_purge() calls to the __skb_queue_purge() variant
>
> Use __skb_queue_head_init() instead of skb_queue_head_init()
> to make clear we do not use arp_queue.lock
>
> And hold neigh->lock in neigh_destroy() to close the race.
>
> Reported-by: Joe Jin <joe.jin@...cle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
> ---
> net/core/neighbour.c | 12 +++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/core/neighbour.c b/net/core/neighbour.c
> index 2569ab2..b7de821 100644
> --- a/net/core/neighbour.c
> +++ b/net/core/neighbour.c
> @@ -231,7 +231,7 @@ static void neigh_flush_dev(struct neigh_table *tbl, struct net_device *dev)
> we must kill timers etc. and move
> it to safe state.
> */
> - skb_queue_purge(&n->arp_queue);
> + __skb_queue_purge(&n->arp_queue);
> n->arp_queue_len_bytes = 0;
> n->output = neigh_blackhole;
> if (n->nud_state & NUD_VALID)
> @@ -286,7 +286,7 @@ static struct neighbour *neigh_alloc(struct neigh_table *tbl, struct net_device
> if (!n)
> goto out_entries;
>
> - skb_queue_head_init(&n->arp_queue);
> + __skb_queue_head_init(&n->arp_queue);
> rwlock_init(&n->lock);
> seqlock_init(&n->ha_lock);
> n->updated = n->used = now;
> @@ -708,7 +708,9 @@ void neigh_destroy(struct neighbour *neigh)
> if (neigh_del_timer(neigh))
> pr_warn("Impossible event\n");
>
> - skb_queue_purge(&neigh->arp_queue);
> + write_lock_bh(&neigh->lock);
> + __skb_queue_purge(&neigh->arp_queue);
> + write_unlock_bh(&neigh->lock);
> neigh->arp_queue_len_bytes = 0;
>
> if (dev->netdev_ops->ndo_neigh_destroy)
> @@ -858,7 +860,7 @@ static void neigh_invalidate(struct neighbour *neigh)
> neigh->ops->error_report(neigh, skb);
> write_lock(&neigh->lock);
> }
> - skb_queue_purge(&neigh->arp_queue);
> + __skb_queue_purge(&neigh->arp_queue);
> neigh->arp_queue_len_bytes = 0;
> }
>
> @@ -1210,7 +1212,7 @@ int neigh_update(struct neighbour *neigh, const u8 *lladdr, u8 new,
>
> write_lock_bh(&neigh->lock);
> }
> - skb_queue_purge(&neigh->arp_queue);
> + __skb_queue_purge(&neigh->arp_queue);
> neigh->arp_queue_len_bytes = 0;
> }
> out:
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists