netdev - Re: [RFC Patch net-next 1/5] net: introduce generic union inet

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 01 Jul 2013 15:00:29 +0800
From:	Cong Wang <amwang@...hat.com>
To:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
	Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>,
	Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
	Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@...hat.com>, Ding@...per.es
Subject: Re: [RFC Patch net-next 1/5] net: introduce generic union inet_addr

On Thu, 2013-06-27 at 10:15 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-06-27 at 14:43 +0800, Cong Wang wrote:
> > Cc: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <amwang@...hat.com>
> 
> Hi Cong.
> 
> I think this is premature.
> 
> Please let the discussion and implementation
> for %pI[gS]<foo> play out and be accepted
> into next before using it in other subsystems.
> 
> 

Yeah, I already talked with Daniel off-list, and I agree his %pIS patch
should go first.

(Also I apologized to him for forgetting to credit him when I submitted
this patchset.)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html