[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1372668049.2974.25.camel@cr0>
Date: Mon, 01 Jul 2013 16:40:49 +0800
From: Cong Wang <amwang@...hat.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC Patch net-next 3/5] inetpeer: use generic union inet_addr
On Thu, 2013-06-27 at 01:01 -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-06-27 at 14:43 +0800, Cong Wang wrote:
> > struct inet_peer {
> > /* group together avl_left,avl_right,v4daddr to speedup lookups */
> > struct inet_peer __rcu *avl_left, *avl_right;
> > - struct inetpeer_addr daddr;
> > + union inet_addr daddr;
>
> Please compare sizeof(struct inetpeer_addr) and sizeof(union inet_addr)
>
> If I am not mistaken, its 20 bytes instead of 28
>
> Yes, sockaddr_in6 is a bit bloated...
>
You are right.
Are you saying that I should rearrange the fields of struct inet_peer in
case of cacheline miss?
Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists