netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH] sctp: Don't lookup dst if transport dst is still valid

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <51D2E3C8.5050100@gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 02 Jul 2013 10:29:28 -0400
From:	Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@...il.com>
To:	Fan Du <fan.du@...driver.com>
CC:	nhorman@...driver.com, nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com,
	davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] sctp: Don't lookup dst if transport dst is still
 valid

On 07/02/2013 02:39 AM, Fan Du wrote:
> When sctp sits on IPv6, sctp_transport_dst_check pass cookie as ZERO,
> as a result ip6_dst_check always fail out. This behaviour makes
> transport->dst useless, because every sctp_packet_transmit must look
> for valid dst(Is this what supposed to be?)
>
> One aggressive way is to call rt_genid_bump which invalid all dst to
> make new dst for transport, apparently it also hurts others.
> I'm sure this may not be the best for all, so any commnets?
>
> Signed-off-by: Fan Du <fan.du@...driver.com>
> ---
>   include/net/sctp/sctp.h |   18 ++++++++++++------
>   net/sctp/ipv6.c         |    2 ++
>   2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/net/sctp/sctp.h b/include/net/sctp/sctp.h
> index cd89510..f05af01 100644
> --- a/include/net/sctp/sctp.h
> +++ b/include/net/sctp/sctp.h
> @@ -719,14 +719,20 @@ static inline void sctp_v4_map_v6(union sctp_addr *addr)
>   	addr->v6.sin6_addr.s6_addr32[2] = htonl(0x0000ffff);
>   }
>
> -/* The cookie is always 0 since this is how it's used in the
> - * pmtu code.
> - */
> +/* Set cookie with the right one for IPv6 and zero for others */
>   static inline struct dst_entry *sctp_transport_dst_check(struct sctp_transport *t)
>   {
> -	if (t->dst && !dst_check(t->dst, 0)) {
> -		dst_release(t->dst);
> -		t->dst = NULL;
> +
> +	if (t->dst) {
> +		struct rt6_info *rt = (struct rt6_info *)t->dst;
> +		u32 cookie = 0;
> +
> +		if ((t->af_specific->sa_family == AF_INET6) && rt->rt6i_node)	
> +			cookie = rt->rt6i_node->fn_sernum;	
> +		if (!dst_check(t->dst, cookie)) {
> +			dst_release(t->dst);
> +			t->dst = NULL;
> +		}
>   	}

I think it would be better if we stored the dst_cookie in the transport 
structure and initialized it at lookup time.   If you do that, then if 
the route table changes, we'd correctly detect it without artificially 
bumping rt_genid (and hurting ipv4).

-vlad

>
>   	return t->dst;
> diff --git a/net/sctp/ipv6.c b/net/sctp/ipv6.c
> index 8ee553b..cfae77e 100644
> --- a/net/sctp/ipv6.c
> +++ b/net/sctp/ipv6.c
> @@ -137,6 +137,8 @@ static int sctp_inet6addr_event(struct notifier_block *this, unsigned long ev,
>   		break;
>   	}
>
> +	/* invalid all transport dst forcing to look up new dst */
> +	rt_genid_bump(net);
>   	return NOTIFY_DONE;
>   }
>
>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html