netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH] sctp: Don't lookup dst if transport dst is still valid

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <51D389F9.4030804@windriver.com>
Date:	Wed, 3 Jul 2013 10:18:33 +0800
From:	Fan Du <fan.du@...driver.com>
To:	Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@...il.com>
CC:	<nhorman@...driver.com>, <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>,
	<davem@...emloft.net>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] sctp: Don't lookup dst if transport dst is still
 valid



On 2013年07月02日 22:29, Vlad Yasevich wrote:
> On 07/02/2013 02:39 AM, Fan Du wrote:
>> When sctp sits on IPv6, sctp_transport_dst_check pass cookie as ZERO,
>> as a result ip6_dst_check always fail out. This behaviour makes
>> transport->dst useless, because every sctp_packet_transmit must look
>> for valid dst(Is this what supposed to be?)
>>
>> One aggressive way is to call rt_genid_bump which invalid all dst to
>> make new dst for transport, apparently it also hurts others.
>> I'm sure this may not be the best for all, so any commnets?
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Fan Du <fan.du@...driver.com>
>> ---
>> include/net/sctp/sctp.h | 18 ++++++++++++------
>> net/sctp/ipv6.c | 2 ++
>> 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/net/sctp/sctp.h b/include/net/sctp/sctp.h
>> index cd89510..f05af01 100644
>> --- a/include/net/sctp/sctp.h
>> +++ b/include/net/sctp/sctp.h
>> @@ -719,14 +719,20 @@ static inline void sctp_v4_map_v6(union sctp_addr *addr)
>> addr->v6.sin6_addr.s6_addr32[2] = htonl(0x0000ffff);
>> }
>>
>> -/* The cookie is always 0 since this is how it's used in the
>> - * pmtu code.
>> - */
>> +/* Set cookie with the right one for IPv6 and zero for others */
>> static inline struct dst_entry *sctp_transport_dst_check(struct sctp_transport *t)
>> {
>> - if (t->dst && !dst_check(t->dst, 0)) {
>> - dst_release(t->dst);
>> - t->dst = NULL;
>> +
>> + if (t->dst) {
>> + struct rt6_info *rt = (struct rt6_info *)t->dst;
>> + u32 cookie = 0;
>> +
>> + if ((t->af_specific->sa_family == AF_INET6) && rt->rt6i_node)
>> + cookie = rt->rt6i_node->fn_sernum;
>> + if (!dst_check(t->dst, cookie)) {
>> + dst_release(t->dst);
>> + t->dst = NULL;
>> + }
>> }
>
> I think it would be better if we stored the dst_cookie in the transport structure and initialized it at lookup time. If you do that, then if the route table changes, we'd correctly detect it without artificially bumping rt_genid (and hurting ipv4).

Hi Vlad/Neil

Is this what you mean?

diff --git a/include/net/sctp/sctp.h b/include/net/sctp/sctp.h
index cd89510..0a646a5 100644
--- a/include/net/sctp/sctp.h
+++ b/include/net/sctp/sctp.h
@@ -724,7 +724,7 @@ static inline void sctp_v4_map_v6(union sctp_addr *addr)
   */
  static inline struct dst_entry *sctp_transport_dst_check(struct sctp_transport *t)
  {
-       if (t->dst && !dst_check(t->dst, 0)) {
+       if (t->dst && !dst_check(t->dst, t->dst_cookie)) {
                 dst_release(t->dst);
                 t->dst = NULL;
         }
diff --git a/include/net/sctp/structs.h b/include/net/sctp/structs.h
index 1bd4c41..cafdd19 100644
--- a/include/net/sctp/structs.h
+++ b/include/net/sctp/structs.h
@@ -946,6 +946,8 @@ struct sctp_transport {
         __u64 hb_nonce;

         struct rcu_head rcu;
+
+       u32 dst_cookie;
  };

  struct sctp_transport *sctp_transport_new(struct net *, const union sctp_addr *,
diff --git a/net/sctp/ipv6.c b/net/sctp/ipv6.c
index 8ee553b..82a420f 100644
--- a/net/sctp/ipv6.c
+++ b/net/sctp/ipv6.c
@@ -350,6 +350,7 @@ out:
                 struct rt6_info *rt;
                 rt = (struct rt6_info *)dst;
                 t->dst = dst;
+               t->dst_cookie = rt->rt6i_node ? rt->rt6i_node->fn_sernum : 0;
                 SCTP_DEBUG_PRINTK("rt6_dst:%pI6 rt6_src:%pI6\n",
                         &rt->rt6i_dst.addr, &fl6->saddr);
         } else {





> -vlad
>
>>
>> return t->dst;
>> diff --git a/net/sctp/ipv6.c b/net/sctp/ipv6.c
>> index 8ee553b..cfae77e 100644
>> --- a/net/sctp/ipv6.c
>> +++ b/net/sctp/ipv6.c
>> @@ -137,6 +137,8 @@ static int sctp_inet6addr_event(struct notifier_block *this, unsigned long ev,
>> break;
>> }
>>
>> + /* invalid all transport dst forcing to look up new dst */
>> + rt_genid_bump(net);
>> return NOTIFY_DONE;
>> }
>>
>>
>
>

-- 
浮沉随浪只记今朝笑

--fan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html