netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH] sctp: Don't lookup dst if transport dst is still valid

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <51D4312F.1010802@gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 03 Jul 2013 10:11:59 -0400
From:	Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@...il.com>
To:	Fan Du <fan.du@...driver.com>
CC:	nhorman@...driver.com, nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com,
	davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] sctp: Don't lookup dst if transport dst is still
 valid

On 07/03/2013 09:23 AM, Vlad Yasevich wrote:
> On 07/02/2013 10:18 PM, Fan Du wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2013年07月02日 22:29, Vlad Yasevich wrote:
>>> On 07/02/2013 02:39 AM, Fan Du wrote:
>>>> When sctp sits on IPv6, sctp_transport_dst_check pass cookie as ZERO,
>>>> as a result ip6_dst_check always fail out. This behaviour makes
>>>> transport->dst useless, because every sctp_packet_transmit must look
>>>> for valid dst(Is this what supposed to be?)
>>>>
>>>> One aggressive way is to call rt_genid_bump which invalid all dst to
>>>> make new dst for transport, apparently it also hurts others.
>>>> I'm sure this may not be the best for all, so any commnets?
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Fan Du <fan.du@...driver.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> include/net/sctp/sctp.h | 18 ++++++++++++------
>>>> net/sctp/ipv6.c | 2 ++
>>>> 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/include/net/sctp/sctp.h b/include/net/sctp/sctp.h
>>>> index cd89510..f05af01 100644
>>>> --- a/include/net/sctp/sctp.h
>>>> +++ b/include/net/sctp/sctp.h
>>>> @@ -719,14 +719,20 @@ static inline void sctp_v4_map_v6(union
>>>> sctp_addr *addr)
>>>> addr->v6.sin6_addr.s6_addr32[2] = htonl(0x0000ffff);
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> -/* The cookie is always 0 since this is how it's used in the
>>>> - * pmtu code.
>>>> - */
>>>> +/* Set cookie with the right one for IPv6 and zero for others */
>>>> static inline struct dst_entry *sctp_transport_dst_check(struct
>>>> sctp_transport *t)
>>>> {
>>>> - if (t->dst && !dst_check(t->dst, 0)) {
>>>> - dst_release(t->dst);
>>>> - t->dst = NULL;
>>>> +
>>>> + if (t->dst) {
>>>> + struct rt6_info *rt = (struct rt6_info *)t->dst;
>>>> + u32 cookie = 0;
>>>> +
>>>> + if ((t->af_specific->sa_family == AF_INET6) && rt->rt6i_node)
>>>> + cookie = rt->rt6i_node->fn_sernum;
>>>> + if (!dst_check(t->dst, cookie)) {
>>>> + dst_release(t->dst);
>>>> + t->dst = NULL;
>>>> + }
>>>> }
>>>
>>> I think it would be better if we stored the dst_cookie in the
>>> transport structure and initialized it at lookup time. If you do that,
>>> then if the route table changes, we'd correctly detect it without
>>> artificially bumping rt_genid (and hurting ipv4).
>>
>> Hi Vlad/Neil
>>
>> Is this what you mean?
>
> Yes, exactly.
>
> -vlad
>
>>
>> diff --git a/include/net/sctp/sctp.h b/include/net/sctp/sctp.h
>> index cd89510..0a646a5 100644
>> --- a/include/net/sctp/sctp.h
>> +++ b/include/net/sctp/sctp.h
>> @@ -724,7 +724,7 @@ static inline void sctp_v4_map_v6(union sctp_addr
>> *addr)
>>    */
>>   static inline struct dst_entry *sctp_transport_dst_check(struct
>> sctp_transport *t)
>>   {
>> -       if (t->dst && !dst_check(t->dst, 0)) {
>> +       if (t->dst && !dst_check(t->dst, t->dst_cookie)) {
>>                  dst_release(t->dst);
>>                  t->dst = NULL;
>>          }
>> diff --git a/include/net/sctp/structs.h b/include/net/sctp/structs.h
>> index 1bd4c41..cafdd19 100644
>> --- a/include/net/sctp/structs.h
>> +++ b/include/net/sctp/structs.h
>> @@ -946,6 +946,8 @@ struct sctp_transport {
>>          __u64 hb_nonce;
>>
>>          struct rcu_head rcu;
>> +
>> +       u32 dst_cookie;
>>   };

One comment is that you might try to find a way to put the dst_cookie 
closer to the cached dst.  See if there is a hole the you can fill.

-vlad

>>
>>   struct sctp_transport *sctp_transport_new(struct net *, const union
>> sctp_addr *,
>> diff --git a/net/sctp/ipv6.c b/net/sctp/ipv6.c
>> index 8ee553b..82a420f 100644
>> --- a/net/sctp/ipv6.c
>> +++ b/net/sctp/ipv6.c
>> @@ -350,6 +350,7 @@ out:
>>                  struct rt6_info *rt;
>>                  rt = (struct rt6_info *)dst;
>>                  t->dst = dst;
>> +               t->dst_cookie = rt->rt6i_node ? rt->rt6i_node->fn_sernum
>> : 0;
>>                  SCTP_DEBUG_PRINTK("rt6_dst:%pI6 rt6_src:%pI6\n",
>>                          &rt->rt6i_dst.addr, &fl6->saddr);
>>          } else {
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> -vlad
>>>
>>>>
>>>> return t->dst;
>>>> diff --git a/net/sctp/ipv6.c b/net/sctp/ipv6.c
>>>> index 8ee553b..cfae77e 100644
>>>> --- a/net/sctp/ipv6.c
>>>> +++ b/net/sctp/ipv6.c
>>>> @@ -137,6 +137,8 @@ static int sctp_inet6addr_event(struct
>>>> notifier_block *this, unsigned long ev,
>>>> break;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> + /* invalid all transport dst forcing to look up new dst */
>>>> + rt_genid_bump(net);
>>>> return NOTIFY_DONE;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html