[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51D45BD3.4050602@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2013 19:13:55 +0200
From: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>
To: Jesse Gross <jesse@...ira.com>
CC: netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"dev@...nvswitch.org" <dev@...nvswitch.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ovs: queue_userspace_packet: bail out if nla_nest_start
returns NULL
On 07/03/2013 06:32 PM, Jesse Gross wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 1:49 AM, Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com> wrote:
>> The return value of nla_nest_start() is not checked, and can be NULL,
>> which is then being dereferenced in nla_nest_end(). Add a check to
>> prevent such situations.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>
>> ---
>> On top of "net-next" tree.
>>
>> net/openvswitch/datapath.c | 4 ++++
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/openvswitch/datapath.c b/net/openvswitch/datapath.c
>> index d12d6b8..51a3c66 100644
>> --- a/net/openvswitch/datapath.c
>> +++ b/net/openvswitch/datapath.c
>> @@ -427,6 +427,10 @@ static int queue_userspace_packet(struct net *net, int dp_ifindex,
>> upcall->dp_ifindex = dp_ifindex;
>>
>> nla = nla_nest_start(user_skb, OVS_PACKET_ATTR_KEY);
>> + if (unlikely(!nla)) {
>> + err = -ENOMEM;
>> + goto out;
>> + }
>
> nla_nest_start() doesn't allocate any memory, it only fails if there
> isn't enough space, so the correct error code would be -EMSGSIZE.
> However, we just calculated the correct size a few lines earlier and
> we don't double check the size anywhere else, so this doesn't make a
> lot of sense to me.
Fair enough, please drop this then.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists