[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1373296938.4979.111.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2013 08:22:18 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com>
Cc: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@...rix.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@...rix.com>,
Dion Kant <g.w.kant@...enet.nl>, xen-devel@...ts.xen.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen-netfront: pull on receive skb may need
to happen earlier
On Mon, 2013-07-08 at 15:20 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Okay, so with that done (see below) Dion is now seeing the
> WARN_ON_ONCE(delta < len) in skb_try_coalesce() triggering. Of
> course, with it having crashed before, it's hard to tell whether the
> triggering now is an effect of the patch, or just got unmasked by it.
Please note this warning is not the sign of an error.
It can be triggered because network stack (IP + TCP) had to reallocate
skb->head to hold all the headers.
pskb_may_pull() doesn't change skb->truesize, for various reasons, so we
can have a situation where the warning triggers.
For example, it can happen when drivers use a really small skb->head,
like 64 bytes, as its not big enough to hold ethernet+IP+TCP headers.
For example, I did a patch on a wifi driver (iwl3945: better skb
management in rx path) because of this sub optimal skb->head sizing.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists