lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 06:01:43 -0400 (EDT) From: Cong Wang <amwang@...hat.com> To: Pravin B Shelar <pshelar@...ira.com> Cc: netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org> Subject: A performance regression of gretap Hi, Pravin I just noticed the performance over gretap is very bad, which is probably caused by your GRE refactor patches. See below: # netperf -4 -H 192.168.2.1 MIGRATED TCP STREAM TEST from 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0) port 0 AF_INET to 192.168.2.1 () port 0 AF_INET Recv Send Send Socket Socket Message Elapsed Size Size Size Time Throughput bytes bytes bytes secs. 10^6bits/sec 87380 16384 16384 14.01 0.02 Could you please take a look? And, gre tunnel is fine, this problem only exists for gretap. I reviewed the gretap code, but can't find any bug. It is very easy to reproduce, just setup a gretap device on both ends, and run netperf over it. Thanks! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists