netdev - Re: [PATCH] virtio-net: put virtio net header inline with data

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130711130007.GA3794@redhat.com>
Date:	Thu, 11 Jul 2013 16:00:07 +0300
From:	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
	Cong Wang <amwang@...hat.com>, Amos Kong <akong@...hat.com>,
	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
	virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, qemu-devel@...gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] virtio-net: put virtio net header inline with data

On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 11:46:23AM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
> "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com> writes:
> > For small packets we can simplify xmit processing
> > by linearizing buffers with the header:
> > most packets seem to have enough head room
> > we can use for this purpose.
> > Since existing hypervisors require that header
> > is the first s/g element, we need a feature bit
> > for this.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com>
> > ---
> >
> > Note: this needs to be applied on top of patch
> > defining VIRTIO_F_ANY_LAYOUT - bit to be
> > selected by Rusty.
> >
> > The following patch should work for any definition of
> > VIRTIO_F_ANY_LAYOUT - I used bit 31 for testing.
> > Rusty, could you please pick a valid bit for VIRTIO_F_ANY_LAYOUT
> > and squeeze this patch into 3.11?
> 
> Sorry, it's too late.
> 
> First, I've been a bit lax in sending patches via DaveM, and this is
> definitely his territory (ie. more net than virtio).
> 
> Secondly, it needs baking and testing time.
> 
> Cheers,
> Rusty.

Okay. But we can already commit the qemu change, right?
Also, can you submit the spec update please?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html