netdev - Re: [RFC] Any value in having a netdev FAQ?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1374076608.1949.89.camel@joe-AO722>
Date:	Wed, 17 Jul 2013 08:56:48 -0700
From:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:	Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>
Cc:	Darren Hart <dvhart@...ux.intel.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Any value in having a netdev FAQ?

On Wed, 2013-07-17 at 11:18 -0400, Paul Gortmaker wrote:

> > Do we really need different coding styles for different sub directories
> > of the same source tree? I won't say anything more on this or try to
> > argue the point, it isn't my call. Just seems.... strange to me.
> 
> It is what it is; I'm just documenting it here.

Not that duplication is bad, but that comment style
variation is documented in CodingStyle.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html