netdev - Re: [DISCUSSION] rt6i

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <51E805D9.9040408@6wind.com>
Date:	Thu, 18 Jul 2013 17:12:25 +0200
From:	Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>
To:	Fan Du <fan.du@...driver.com>
CC:	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] rt6i_genid

Le 18/07/2013 11:28, Fan Du a écrit :
>
> Thanks for replying :)
>
> On 2013年07月18日 17:13, Nicolas Dichtel wrote:
>> Le 18/07/2013 05:22, Fan Du a écrit :
>>> Hello Nicolas
>>>
>>> Commit 6f3118b571b8a4c06c7985dc3172c3526cb86253: "ipv6: use net->rt_genid to
>>> check dst validity"
>>> makes ip6_dst_check to check rt6i_genid against with struct net->rt_genid,
>>> As a matter of fact, struct net->rt_genid could only be modified by two places,
>>> first is adding/delete IPv4 address, second is inserting new XFRM policy.
>>>
>>> Is there any other considerations that adding/deleting IPv4 address would
>>> invalid all IPv6 dst
>>> as well? because I'm working a patch which actually depends on the result of
>>> this question.
>> No, the goal was to cover the IPsec case, ie invalidate dst entries when an
>> xfrm policy is inserted/deleted.
>
> Ok, then how about we only checking rt6i_genid against rt_genid *only*
> when XFRM is enabled for IPv6, because when XFRM is not enabled for IPv6
> ip6_dst_check for rt_genid is really not necessary.
>
> So what do you think of below modifications?
Seems good. Just a small comment below.

>
> diff --git a/include/net/ip6_fib.h b/include/net/ip6_fib.h
> index 2a601e7..4ae35fd 100644
> --- a/include/net/ip6_fib.h
> +++ b/include/net/ip6_fib.h
> @@ -119,7 +119,9 @@ struct rt6_info {
>          struct inet6_dev                *rt6i_idev;
>          unsigned long                   _rt6i_peer;
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_XFRM
>          u32                             rt6i_genid;
> +#endif
>
>          /* more non-fragment space at head required */
>          unsigned short                  rt6i_nfheader_len;
> diff --git a/net/ipv6/route.c b/net/ipv6/route.c
> index bd5fd70..1b64406 100644
> --- a/net/ipv6/route.c
> +++ b/net/ipv6/route.c
> @@ -277,7 +277,9 @@ static inline struct rt6_info *ip6_dst_alloc(struct net *net,
>
>                  memset(dst + 1, 0, sizeof(*rt) - sizeof(*dst));
>                  rt6_init_peer(rt, table ? &table->tb6_peers : net->ipv6.peers);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_XFRM
>                  rt->rt6i_genid = rt_genid(net);
> +#endif
>                  INIT_LIST_HEAD(&rt->rt6i_siblings);
>                  rt->rt6i_nsiblings = 0;
>          }
> @@ -1041,12 +1043,15 @@ static struct dst_entry *ip6_dst_check(struct dst_entry
> *dst, u32 cookie)
>
>          rt = (struct rt6_info *) dst;
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_XFRM
>          /* All IPV6 dsts are created with ->obsolete set to the value
>           * DST_OBSOLETE_FORCE_CHK which forces validation calls down
>           * into this function always.
> +        * Note: for IPv6, rt6i_genid is noly used when XFRM enabled.
indentation is wrong, but I'm not sure this comment is really needed ... you've 
put the ifdef 4 lines above.

>           */
>          if (rt->rt6i_genid != rt_genid(dev_net(rt->dst.dev)))
>                  return NULL;
> +#endif
>
>          if (rt->rt6i_node && (rt->rt6i_node->fn_sernum == cookie))
>                  return dst;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html