[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20130718.130335.991768032324737210.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2013 13:03:35 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: paolo.valente@...more.it
Cc: jhs@...atatu.com, shemminger@...tta.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, fchecconi@...il.com,
rizzo@....unipi.it
Subject: Re: [PATCH BUGFIX] pkt_sched: sch_qfq: remove a source of high
packet delay/jitter
From: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@...more.it>
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 08:52:30 +0200
...
> This patch addresses this issue by just using the above
> 'instantaneous' value of the weight sum, instead of the maximum
> possible value, when updating the system virtual time. After the
> instantaneous weight sum is decreased, QFQ+ may deviate from the ideal
> service for a time interval in the order of the time to serve one
> maximum-size packet for each backlogged class. The worst-case extent
> of the deviation exhibited by QFQ+ during this time interval [1] is
> basically the same as of the deviation described above (but, without
> this patch, QFQ+ suffers from such a deviation all the time). Finally,
> this patch modifies the comment to the function qfq_slot_insert, to
> make it coherent with the fact that the weight sum used by QFQ+ can
> now be lower than the maximum possible value.
>
> [1] P. Valente, "Extending WF2Q+ to support a dynamic traffic mix",
> Proceedings of AAA-IDEA'05, June 2005.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@...more.it>
Thank you for this amazing commit message.
Since you explained everything, even if I don't understand all of the
details of QFQ/QFQ+ I can in fact be confident in your change.
Applied and queued up for -stable, thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists