[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CADVnQymGvV+Egy-w4K1QFNev=7i_iWuHX8oaNfaKAkUj6OWAXA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 15:19:08 -0400
From: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Rick Jones <rick.jones2@...com>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@...gle.com>,
Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net-next 2/2] tcp: TCP_NOTSENT_LOWAT socket option
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 11:27 PM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:
> From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
>
> Idea of this patch is to add optional limitation of number of
> unsent bytes in TCP sockets, to reduce usage of kernel memory.
>
> TCP receiver might announce a big window, and TCP sender autotuning
> might allow a large amount of bytes in write queue, but this has little
> performance impact if a large part of this buffering is wasted :
>
> Write queue needs to be large only to deal with large BDP, not
> necessarily to cope with scheduling delays (incoming ACKS make room
> for the application to queue more bytes)
>
> For most workloads, using a value of 128 KB or less is OK to give
> applications enough time to react to POLLOUT events in time
> (or being awaken in a blocking sendmsg())
>
> This patch adds two ways to set the limit :
>
> 1) Per socket option TCP_NOTSENT_LOWAT
>
> 2) A sysctl (/proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_notsent_lowat) for sockets
> not using TCP_NOTSENT_LOWAT socket option (or setting a zero value)
> Default value being UINT_MAX (0xFFFFFFFF), meaning this has no effect.
>
>
> This changes poll()/select()/epoll() to report POLLOUT
> only if number of unsent bytes is below tp->nosent_lowat
>
> Note this might increase number of sendmsg()/sendfile() calls
> when using non blocking sockets,
> and increase number of context switches for blocking sockets.
>
> Note this is not related to SO_SNDLOWAT (as SO_SNDLOWAT is
> defined as :
> Specify the minimum number of bytes in the buffer until
> the socket layer will pass the data to the protocol)
>
> Tested:
>
> netperf sessions, and watching /proc/net/protocols "memory" column for TCP
>
> With 200 concurrent netperf -t TCP_STREAM sessions, amount of kernel memory
> used by TCP buffers shrinks by ~55 % (20567 pages instead of 45458)
>
> lpq83:~# echo -1 >/proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_notsent_lowat
> lpq83:~# (super_netperf 200 -t TCP_STREAM -H remote -l 90 &); sleep 60 ; grep TCP /proc/net/protocols
> TCPv6 1880 2 45458 no 208 yes ipv6 y y y y y y y y y y y y y n y y y y y
> TCP 1696 508 45458 no 208 yes kernel y y y y y y y y y y y y y n y y y y y
>
> lpq83:~# echo 131072 >/proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_notsent_lowat
> lpq83:~# (super_netperf 200 -t TCP_STREAM -H remote -l 90 &); sleep 60 ; grep TCP /proc/net/protocols
> TCPv6 1880 2 20567 no 208 yes ipv6 y y y y y y y y y y y y y n y y y y y
> TCP 1696 508 20567 no 208 yes kernel y y y y y y y y y y y y y n y y y y y
>
> Using 128KB has no bad effect on the throughput or cpu usage
> of a single flow, although there is an increase of context switches.
>
> A bonus is that we hold socket lock for a shorter amount
> of time and should improve latencies of ACK processing.
>
> lpq83:~# echo -1 >/proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_notsent_lowat
> lpq83:~# perf stat -e context-switches ./netperf -H 7.7.7.84 -t omni -l 20 -c -i10,3
> OMNI Send TEST from 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0) port 0 AF_INET to 7.7.7.84 () port 0 AF_INET : +/-2.500% @ 99% conf.
> Local Remote Local Elapsed Throughput Throughput Local Local Remote Remote Local Remote Service
> Send Socket Recv Socket Send Time Units CPU CPU CPU CPU Service Service Demand
> Size Size Size (sec) Util Util Util Util Demand Demand Units
> Final Final % Method % Method
> 1651584 6291456 16384 20.00 17447.90 10^6bits/s 3.13 S -1.00 U 0.353 -1.000 usec/KB
>
> Performance counter stats for './netperf -H 7.7.7.84 -t omni -l 20 -c -i10,3':
>
> 412,514 context-switches
>
> 200.034645535 seconds time elapsed
>
> lpq83:~# echo 131072 >/proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_notsent_lowat
> lpq83:~# perf stat -e context-switches ./netperf -H 7.7.7.84 -t omni -l 20 -c -i10,3
> OMNI Send TEST from 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0) port 0 AF_INET to 7.7.7.84 () port 0 AF_INET : +/-2.500% @ 99% conf.
> Local Remote Local Elapsed Throughput Throughput Local Local Remote Remote Local Remote Service
> Send Socket Recv Socket Send Time Units CPU CPU CPU CPU Service Service Demand
> Size Size Size (sec) Util Util Util Util Demand Demand Units
> Final Final % Method % Method
> 1593240 6291456 16384 20.00 17321.16 10^6bits/s 3.35 S -1.00 U 0.381 -1.000 usec/KB
>
> Performance counter stats for './netperf -H 7.7.7.84 -t omni -l 20 -c -i10,3':
>
> 2,675,818 context-switches
>
> 200.029651391 seconds time elapsed
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
> Cc: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>
> Cc: Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@...gle.com>
Acked-by: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists