netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] tcp: TCP_NOSENT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1374593287.3449.0.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Date:	Tue, 23 Jul 2013 08:28:07 -0700
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Rick Jones <rick.jones2@...com>
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@...gle.com>,
	Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>,
	Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] tcp: TCP_NOSENT_LOWAT socket option

On Tue, 2013-07-23 at 08:25 -0700, Rick Jones wrote:
> On 07/22/2013 05:13 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > On Mon, 2013-07-22 at 16:08 -0700, Rick Jones wrote:
> >> By the way, does this affect sendfile() or splice()?
> >
> > Sure : Patch intercepts sk_stream_memory_free() for all its callers.
> >
> > 10Gb link 'experiment with sendfile()' :
> 
> Why not the same 20 Gb (?) link you used with the other experiments?

Why not ? I have different kind of links ;)



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html