[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130725090352.574b874d@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net>
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 09:03:52 -0700
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
To: Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@...escale.com>,
Frank Li <Frank.Li@...escale.com>,
Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>, kernel@...gutronix.de,
Hector Palacios <hector.palacios@...i.com>,
Tim Sander <tim.sander@....com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/fec: call netif_carrier_off when not having link
On Thu, 25 Jul 2013 15:27:55 +0200
Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de> wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c
> index 0642006..631bd5a 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c
> @@ -280,11 +280,6 @@ fec_enet_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *ndev)
> unsigned short status;
> unsigned int index;
>
> - if (!fep->link) {
> - /* Link is down or auto-negotiation is in progress. */
> - return NETDEV_TX_BUSY;
> - }
> -
That is a bug anyway. Since it would cause spin loop in transmit
code (even without -rt). If the driver cared to test it (most
drivers just let hardware deal with this situation), then it should
free packet and return TX_OK.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists